国精一二二产品无人区免费应用,精品夜夜爽欧美毛片视频,99久久久无码国产精品免费,精人妻无码一区二区三区

Unitalen Helped Lafite Obtain the Registration of Trademark “拉菲珍寶” Overcoming a Hard-fought Chinese Translation Trademark Obstacle

May 30, 2019

Case Summary

Lafite Rothschild Winery (hereafter referred to as “Lafite Rothschild”) has two world-renowned wines – “CHATEAU LAFITE ROTHSCHILD” and “CARRUADES de LAFITE”. In China, they are also known as "Big Lafite" and "Little Lafite". Although Lafite Rothschild applied for registration of the English logo "LAFITE" early, it did not register the corresponding Chinese translations including "拉菲" and "拉斐" (both as “La Fei” in pinyin), resulting in "拉斐" being registered in Hong Kong in 2002 by a company named “France Rafael Wine (Asia) Co., Ltd.”; because the other party submitted the application on an earlier date, Lafite Rothschild failed to invalidate the "拉斐"  trademark even after escalating the litigation to the trial by the Supreme People’s Court. This had become a hindrance to Lafite Rothschild's endeavor to register the Chinese trademarks including "拉菲".

 

In June 2015, Lafite Rothschild filed to the Trademark Office for the registration of the “拉菲珍寶” (paraphrase as “Lafite Treasures”) trademark designated for use in “wines and other goods” in Class 33. In May 2016, the Trademark Office cited 5 trademarks including the afore mentioned “拉斐” trademark to reject the application (the other 4 trademarks were also invalidated during the proceeding of this case). Lafite Rothschild thus filed for the refusal review with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB). However, the TRAB found that “the application trademark and the reference trademark are composed and pronounced similarly. The two trademarks, if coexist in the market, will make the consumers confused with and misidentifying the sources of goods., thus it has constituted trademark similarity in the same or similar goods. "

 

 

The Court’s Ruling

Unitalen, representing Lafite Rothschild, appealed to the court, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court of the first-instance and the Beijing Higher People's Court of the second instance all ruled to revoke the ruling of the TRAB and held that the application trademark “拉菲珍寶” and the reference trademark “拉斐” do not constitute similarity, the coexistence in Class 33 “wines and other goods” will not cause confusion and misidentification among consumers.

 

 

Typical Significance

The typical significance of this case is that the popularity of the application trademark is included in the consideration for the determination of similarity of the trademark and whether it is easy to cause confusion and misidentification in the review of refused trademark. In the past cases, it was rare to see in the judgment of a refusal review the expression of “existing market share formed” of an application trademark, and more importantly, the examination of the similarity of the mark itself. However, the popularity of the trademark and the trademark itself are integrated. The relevant consumers, in identifying the source of goods and services by a trademark, will also consider its popularity as one of the factors. Therefore, in reviewing the similarity of a trademark, it is objective, fair and realistic to consider the evidence of the popularity of the trademark before its filing date.

 

Keywords

主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人午夜看黄在线尤物成人| 国模大尺度福利视频在线| 河北真实伦对白精彩脏话| 老师黑色丝袜被躁翻了av| 久久中文字幕人妻熟av女蜜柚m | 国产综合久久亚洲综合| 亚洲精品国产第一区二区尤物| 一个人看的www片免费高清视频| 双腿张开被9个黑人调教影片| 国产成人无码aa片免费看| 日本三级香港三级三级人!妇久| 日日干夜夜干| 国产成人精品免高潮在线观看| 久久人妻精品白浆国产| 饥渴丰满少妇大力进入| 亚洲成av人片在线观看天堂无 | 亚洲va中文字幕无码一区| 国产午夜福利100集发布| 国产精品亚洲а∨天堂免| 欧美亚洲日韩国产人成在线播放 | 无码人妻精品一区二区蜜桃色欲| 国产粉嫩馒头无套内在线观看免费| 午夜做受视频试看6次| 人妻久久久一区二区三区| 国产综合有码无码中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久午夜无码一区二区| 亚洲精品国精品久久99热| 欧美无遮挡很黄裸交视频| 国内精品人妻久久毛片app| 日韩精品少妇无码受不了| 51国产黑色丝袜高跟鞋| 亚洲色在线无码国产精品不卡| 久久久精品人妻一区亚美研究所| 国产麻豆精品乱码一区| 久久亚洲精品无码网站| _97夜夜澡人人爽人人喊_欧美| 一区二区三区精品视频免费播放| 大屁股熟女白浆一区二区| 国产精品亚洲二区在线看| 日韩精品久久久久久久电影蜜臀| 国产乱子伦视频大全|